Do You Think He Knew? Trump & Zelenskyy

By now, you’ve probably heard about the showdown between President Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in the Oval Office. Depending on which news source you follow, it was either a total disaster or a masterclass in foreign policy power moves.

But here’s the real question: Was this all part of a bigger play?

Let’s break it down.

Trump’s Got a Playbook—Even If It Looks Like Chaos

Like him or not, Trump doesn’t do subtle. He’s a guy who thrives on disruption, knowing full well that whatever he says or does will get a knee-jerk reaction—especially from European leaders and American liberals.

So, was this a calculated move? Did he go hard on Zelensky knowing that the world, particularly Europe, would reflexively rush to support Ukraine just to push back against him? If that’s the case, it worked.

Within hours, European leaders were scrambling to reaffirm their support for Ukraine. But let’s be honest—most of that support was just words. The only real exception? The UK, which threw $2 billion into the pot.

Coincidence? Or was Trump playing chess while everyone else was playing checkers?

Europe’s Reaction: Predictable or Engineered?

For months, Europe has been dragging its feet on real financial aid for Ukraine. Plenty of statements, plenty of “we stand with you” speeches, but when it comes time to cut the checks? Suddenly, the enthusiasm dies down.

Then Trump lights up Zelensky in the Oval Office, and suddenly, everyone’s running to pledge their unwavering support. But here’s the thing—most of that support is still just talk. The UK is the only one who actually backed it up with money.

So, if Trump’s goal was to force Europe’s hand, did it work? Kind of. The UK stepped up, but the rest of Europe is still clapping from the sidelines.

Brilliant Strategy or Just a Blow-Up That Worked Out?

Of course, there’s always the chance that this wasn’t strategy at all—just Trump being Trump. Maybe he got frustrated, said what was on his mind, and the whole thing snowballed into a global spectacle. If that’s the case, Ukraine just lucked out that it played in their favor.

But even if it wasn’t planned, Trump isn’t the kind of guy to let a situation go to waste. If the backlash helps push more money or weapons toward Ukraine, you can bet he’ll take the credit for it.

What Do You Think?

Did Trump see this coming a mile away? Did he know that coming down hard on Zelensky would force the world to rally behind Ukraine? Or was it just another chaotic moment that ended up working out?

Coincidence? Strategy? Something else?

Let’s hear it.

Comments

The Danger of Echo Chambers: Why We Need to Break Free

It’s easy to surround yourself with voices that tell you exactly what you want to hear. Whether you’re watching Fox News and scrolling Truth Social or flipping to MSNBC while scrolling Bluesky , you’re in an echo chamber. And while it feels good to have your beliefs reinforced, it’s also a trap—one that narrows your thinking, deepens divisions, and makes real conversation almost impossible. What’s an Echo Chamber, Anyway? An echo chamber is when you’re only exposed to opinions that match your own. Social media and news networks thrive on this—they keep you engaged by feeding you more of what you already agree with. Over time, you start believing your perspective is the only reasonable one, and anyone who disagrees must be clueless, brainwashed, or just plain wrong. Why That’s a Problem It Locks in Your Biases – If you never challenge your own thinking, you stop growing. It Fuels Division – The less you hear from “the other side,” the easier it is to see them as the enemy. It...

How Democratic Hyperbole is Costing Them Power and Donors

The Democratic Party has spent the better part of the last decade perfecting the art of outrage. Every election cycle, every Supreme Court ruling, every conservative policy has been met with the same hysteria: democracy is on the verge of collapse, Trump is a dictator, and America is teetering on the edge of fascism. But after years of breathless hyperbole, something is hap pening that Democrats didn’t see coming—people are tuning them out. Worse, their biggest donors are walking away. A recent New York Times article, “Venting at Democrats and Fearing Trump, Liberal Donors Pull Back Cash” (Feb. 16, 2025), lays out in devastating detail how Democratic fearmongering and dysfunction have led to a mass exodus of donor support. The small-dollar donors who poured millions into resisting Trump in 2017? They’ve checked out. The billionaire donors who have propped up progressive institutions for years? They’re either backing off or hedging their bets with Trump. A Party in Financial Fre...

The Problem with Negotiated Peace: How the Camp David Accords Did More Harm Than Good

The Camp David Accords are often held up as a shining example of diplomacy—proof that enemies can sit down, talk it out, and walk away with a deal that keeps everyone happy. But here’s the thing: real peace doesn’t come from compromise. It comes from victory. Had the war between Israel and Egypt run its course, had there been a clear winner and loser, the Middle East might look very different today. Instead, we got a “peace” agreement that did little more than hit pause on a fight that was bound to continue. And it has, in many different ways. And let’s be honest—this wasn’t about long-term peace. It was about President Jimmy Carter chasing a legacy. He wanted to be the great peacemaker, the man who ended war in the Middle East. He wanted that Nobel Peace Prize. But in doing so, he ignored the reality of the conflict, and in the end, his prize cost both Israeli and Arab lives. The Accords Didn’t End the Conflict—They Just Changed the Rules On the surface, the Camp David Accords looked ...

She Calls Me Grumpy

Search This Blog